BOEING E-3 Sentry

28 Mar 2019 17:15 #11 by Jeff Hawley
Replied by Jeff Hawley on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
I flew in one of those over Bosnia during Operation Deny Flight. Great crew.

Vice Chairman
Director/Trustee
Community Heritage & Conservation Manager
Archives Manager
Airfield Research Group Ltd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

01 Apr 2019 10:55 #12 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
I suspect that the aircraft have been used for lots more flying than was thought of. Who for instance foresaw that whey would be used over the former yugoslavia? And when we sent them from Waddington it was a two hour transit to get to their orbit, add all those hours up and thats a lot of time on the airframes. Plus theres all the exercises they took part in. I was at Butterworth in 97 and we had a Sentry with us. That aircraft had come from an exercise at Darwin, from Butterworth it went to Japan (the Japanese were interested in the software the RAF used as it was going to their 767 based AWACs). And from Japan it went to Alaska for COPE THUNDER. So those airframes have had quite a bit of use.

But heres a question, how many people can a Sentry actually carry?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Aug 2019 18:04 #13 by kebecker
Replied by kebecker on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
Taken over Wicken Fen in 2013

This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.

The following user(s) said Thank You: canberra

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Feb 2020 12:00 #14 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
One of the original Air Technicians has retired at Waddington after 51 years service in the RAF.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Oct 2020 09:52 #15 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
Just realised that the picture taken of one over Wicken Fen is one of the NATO E3s.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Oct 2020 18:11 #16 by kebecker
Replied by kebecker on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
I have seen NATO and/or OTAN on the fuselage, Problem is I cannot recall if it was when driving past Waddington or in a photograph or film/tv segment somewhere.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Oct 2020 10:15 #17 by IanDDavidson
Replied by IanDDavidson on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry

I suspect that the aircraft have been used for lots more flying than was thought of. Who for instance foresaw that whey would be used over the former yugoslavia? And when we sent them from Waddington it was a two hour transit to get to their orbit, add all those hours up and thats a lot of time on the airframes. Plus theres all the exercises they took part in. I was at Butterworth in 97 and we had a Sentry with us. That aircraft had come from an exercise at Darwin, from Butterworth it went to Japan (the Japanese were interested in the software the RAF used as it was going to their 767 based AWACs). And from Japan it went to Alaska for COPE THUNDER. So those airframes have had quite a bit of use.

But heres a question, how many people can a Sentry actually carry?


Crew: Flight crew: 4 (aircraft commander, pilot, navigator, flight engineer)
Mission crew: 13–19

Ref; WIKI
The following user(s) said Thank You: canberra

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2020 11:23 #18 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
According to Wiki(so it must be true) NATO are extending the life of their E3s until 2035. And as for those that have NATO on the side its the NATO ones only. Although in my time in the RAF the ones at Waddington did use NATO callsigns for some sorties, it was in fact NATO for the flight deck and MAGIC for the rear crew.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2020 12:00 #19 by IanDDavidson
Replied by IanDDavidson on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry

According to Wiki(so it must be true) NATO are extending the life of their E3s until 2035. And as for those that have NATO on the side its the NATO ones only. Although in my time in the RAF the ones at Waddington did use NATO callsigns for some sorties, it was in fact NATO for the flight deck and MAGIC for the rear crew.



Some of the KC135 at Mildenhall were built in 1958, so over 60 years old. What will replace their role in the fleet? If it's P8 are we back in the realms of cost, and 4 engines vs 2 and so on ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2020 12:13 - 29 Oct 2020 12:16 #20 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic BOEING E-3 Sentry
Presumably a four engine aircraft could fly on two as I think the Nimrod did to increase its loiter time.

When you get aircraft airframes that are over 60 years old it really puts things into perspective when you cast your mind back to what happened to you in those 60 years, assuming some of you are over 60!

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.041 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information