There was a brick built structure at Pawlett Hams (Somerset HER No. 18121) that was noted as being a bombing target.
A similar shape appears to be at Languard Point, Felixstowe, shown in the attached aerial view. I'm not convinced it is a target but wondered if someone could confirm what it is/was so I can cross it off my list of unknowns.
[IMG]/community/73488=4548-Pawlett range marker 18121.jpg[/img]
Pawlett structure ( from Somerset website - taken by Derrick Warren 24/8/1978 ). If this is bombing range related I wonder if this is what the cross in the circle of early bombing targets originally was, it was supposedly painted white?
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
In Michael Bowyer's book "2 Group R.A.F." he writes (page 198) in connection with use of the early B17's by the RAF in June 1941, that "at Ashton Range a pyramid target twenty yards square and thirty feet high was set up for practice with the Mk. 01 Sperry sight."
Seems to me he describes the Pawlett structure pretty well. What do you think?
Looking at the Languard structure in Bing Maps sat view it can be seen clearer and the shadow shows the stepped brick construction of the Pawlett example.
Measured in GE, the Languard example is around 15 feet at the base. In my opinion, the only reason for building a 'tall' bombing target would be to enable the ground based bomb plotters to 'see' the target although I admit it does throw a visible target at low sun angles. Perhaps it was in the centre of a cross and circle as PNK says.
Interestingly the Pawlett structure is labelled "Landmark" on some post war maps.
Given the port at Harwich is just round the point I wondered if it was a navigation beacon of some sort. Found this on Geograph www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1404506
which looks similar but of different proportions.
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
Intriguing. The two structures are not too far from the Carmel Head WW2 Air to Ground Range but I accept that they are unrelated.
If these structures are navigation marks visible from the sea it does not explain the Pawlett Hams (?) item since that would have been to far inland to be visible from seawards.
Now my initial exitement has worn off I am coming to the conclusion that Languard is a beacon of some sort and that Dave Smith is probably correct in the Balloon link for Pawlett Hams. It is the arrow at Pawlett that puts things in doubt but I wonder if it was to guide test aircraft to the balloon cable?
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.