Bomb plotting on ranges - Modern era

14 Aug 2011 15:31 #1 by Peter Kirk
Bomb plotting on ranges - Modern era was created by Peter Kirk
At the end of WW2 the traditional quadrant sight method of plotting paractice bombing accuracy was felt to be too inaccurate. Further methods of automatic recording were looked at in the years just after WW2 and the main conternders were photographic quadrants and sonic recording, neither of which really met the post war criteria and were dropped.
Now to the main question: what is used today as it is referred to as "electronic" recording but based on what? When did the modern method come into use?

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2011 16:08 #2 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic Bomb plotting on ranges - Modern era
I was at Tain 80-82. The method used was that each quadrant on a target took a bearing which was displayed on a fibre optic screen. For instance on target 5 at Tain if the RP quad took a bearing of 48.7 and the main quad took a bearing of 54.0 then that would be a direct hit. To work the score out one of the people in the main quad(or tower) would look in a book,and very quickly too! After a while however you knew what the DHs were for each target. As for sonic scoring, we had the facility at Tain but it was error prone, Ive seen a Jag have a score of 300 hits on one pass! However Nordhorn when I was in Germany only used sonic scoring for strafe runs.

As for when the system I used actually started Ive no idea, but I would guess at the mid seventies. Id be interested to know whats used today.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2011 19:23 #3 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Bomb plotting on ranges - Modern era
Many thanks for the info. I think the first sonic measuring device was intended for Heligoland but the device was prone to false readings so was never pursued at the time (1947). I suspect microphone technology was not quite good enough then.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.038 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information