New Forest National Park

30 Dec 2012 15:31 #21 by John Anderson
Replied by John Anderson on topic New Forest National Park

The MoHS Target is described in detail together with a drawing in Norman's book. Based on structures discovered by RAF recce flights along the French coast, it was built by Morlands at a cost £0.25M. He states, '... its more commonly used name "The Submarine Pens" survives in use among local people today.


In Tim Mason's book "The Secret Years" about Boscombe Down there is a nice oblique photo (no reference number etc.) taken in early 1945 showing the "concrete structure", which he describes as"submarine pens". Not unreasonably it does not appear to be to the same scale as the real thing. There seems to have been 3 or 4 strikes on the target by bombs. Not far from it is the surprising crater said to have been made by a sand filled Grand Slam. The crater seems to have been a similar size to the concrete structure.

At Braidfell near Stranraer there was a concrete "factory target", was this built for similar testing purposes?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Dec 2012 17:11 #22 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic New Forest National Park
John - rather than clutter this thread I posted a little bit here on Braid Fell. /community/showthread.php?5050-Braid-Fell-Range-Extant-Directional-Arrow-base&p=117830&viewfull=1#post117830

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Dec 2012 17:40 #23 by John Anderson
Replied by John Anderson on topic New Forest National Park

John - rather than clutter this thread I posted a little bit here on Braid Fell. /community/showthread.php?5050-Braid-Fell-Range-Extant-Directional-Arrow-base&p=117830&viewfull=1#post117830


Thanks Peter

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Jan 2013 18:39 #24 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic New Forest National Park
The target is referred to as a "bomb resisting shelter" in a document detailing the result of bomb tests on 6ft thick concrete. These tests were carried out by the Ministry of Home Security who presided over the ARP and presumably the public air raid shelters. The test was RC392 and tantilisingly it referred to the target size thus "this size having been selected for reasons recorded in RC208 and RC208A".

Now need to find those two reports, if they still exist to see what and why!

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 09:54 #25 by Richard Drew
Replied by Richard Drew on topic New Forest National Park
The two craters next to the U-boat pen are not that big, now I understand why if they were filled with sand.

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 11:49 #26 by hydealfred
Replied by hydealfred on topic New Forest National Park
I believe the crater in your shot is that made by a Tallboy - there was a crater from the only live Grand Slam dropped at AW nearby but this has been filled in.

Couple of shots follow -Ministry Of Home Security Target (Submarine Pen) - as it is today -

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.



It became evident that the Germans were building substantial concrete structures on the French Coast to house their U-Boats. The RAF were keen to bomb these structures but needed to evaluate how the structures could be penetrated. In order to simulate the structures, a replica was built at Ashley Walk in September 1941 at a cost of £250,000. A huge concrete raft 6’ thick and measuring 79’ by 70’ was constructed. Supported on five walls, 6’ high the structure was built on a foundation 20’’ thick. The outer walls were 3’ 3’’ thick with the inner walls being 1’ 9’’. The RAF tried many times to destroy the pen but were not successful. In fact they had quite an issue with trying to hit the target. The bombs used, 500Ib, were also in reality rather small to make an impression on such a massively constructed structure. I have heard tale that it was only the Americans with their Norden Bomb Site that managed to get a hit on the structure. I cant confirm this though.

A shot of Tallboy crater with the Ministry Of Home Security Target behind -

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 12:55 #27 by NJR
Replied by NJR on topic New Forest National Park
Richard Halls excellent article on Ashley Walk range will be in the March Airfield Review.

"When you stop remembering you start forgetting"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Jan 2015 22:11 #28 by Engimaneer
Replied by Engimaneer on topic New Forest National Park
Is anyone still involved with this project?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jan 2015 13:52 #29 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic New Forest National Park
I don't know. I offered information when the project opened and was told that I would be contacted at a later date. Nothing thus far.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.054 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information