Lightning, static, ammunition and refueling discussion

25 Dec 2008 14:04 #11 by Peter Kirk
Presumably all refuelling equipment is brass or similar to prevent static? I remember seeing a news item in the 70's about Vietnam and one of the Hueys blew up whilst being refuelled. The cause was stated as static.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Dec 2008 14:42 #12 by canberra
Thats a good question, I dont honestly know! But I do know that aircraft are supposed to be earthed before refuelling takes place, problem unique to helicopter if they are being refuelled with the rotors running is that static builds up in the rotors.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Dec 2008 19:30 #13 by Alex Brown

A little bit off topic slightly, but is there any real risk from lightning setting off small arms ammunition? And by small arms I include aircraft cannon shells.


30mm ADEN gun ammunition has electrically initiated primers; they are not struck by a firing pin as percussion caps are.


So presumably the answer with that type of ammunition is yes, it is possible in theory?

Yes, I'm back(ish).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Dec 2008 23:09 #14 by P Bellamy
We still have the lightning conductor rod and earth strap in place on the roof of the Pyro Store at Twinwood Farm.

TTFN,
PB

Paul Bellamy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2008 06:33 #15 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Lightning, static, ammunition and refueling discussion

A little bit off topic slightly, but is there any real risk from lightning setting off small arms ammunition? And by small arms I include aircraft cannon shells.


30mm ADEN gun ammunition has electrically initiated primers; they are not struck by a firing pin as percussion caps are.


So presumably the answer with that type of ammunition is yes, it is possible in theory?


Yes.

But remember, if an unprotected building used for the storage of any high explosive munition whether bomb, shell or ammunition is struck by lightning - whether or not the the munition is electrically intiated - there is a real risk of fire, explosion and propagation. That's why the regulations concerning explosive storage is strict in respect of protection, traversing and safety distances. Even the type of packaging is designed with safety in mind.

For WW2 built airfields the requirement was to provide quick and temporary storage so the regulations prevailing then were 'relaxed' when required and at times even went 'out the window' at many bomb storage areas due to receipts exceeding the authorised capacity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2008 10:21 #16 by canberra
Can you please explain how the ADEN shells work then if they dont have a percussion cap?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2008 07:35 #17 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Lightning, static, ammunition and refueling discussion

Can you please explain how the ADEN shells work then if they dont have a percussion cap?


At the risk of going off the original topic;

Electrical primers for 30mm ammo contain a mix of an explosive and a conducting composition. When the round is in position for firing a 'firing pin' (actually an electrical contact) is touching the cap. When the trigger is pressed, an electrical voltage is connected to the firing pin and goes through the cap to earth. In doing so, the molecules jump around and generate heat which fires the primer and the cartridge. This happens in milli-seconds.

Electrical initiation was developed to speed up the rate of fire of the gun because percussion mechanisms are slower and more complicated. The other factor at the time of development in the late 40s/50s was safety. That is electrical primers were considered to be safer that percussion primers.

Ironically, the latest ADEN development uses percussion firing for safety due to the higher risk of initiation by Radio Frequencies (RADHAZ) caused by the proliferation of RADARs and other emitters.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Dec 2008 16:06 #18 by Alex Brown
I had always just made the assumption that it involved magnesium or similar.

Interesting about the return to percussion caps - makes a lot of sense though when you think about it!

Yes, I'm back(ish).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.044 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information