RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)

19 Jul 2010 08:23 - 03 Apr 2018 14:39 #1 by REF
RAF Airfields in WWII (merged) was created by REF
It seems expensive for what it is, anyone know any more about the publication?
cgi.ebay.co.uk/RAF-AIRFIELDS-WORLD-WAR-I...9dd711f#ht_500wt_928

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2010 09:22 #2 by Able Mabel
Replied by Able Mabel on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
I would suggest you contact the buyer for more details although at that pice i doubt it will sell ...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2010 09:31 #3 by cbrjock
Replied by cbrjock on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
Its been appearing on ebay for past 6 months or so at same price!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2010 10:11 #4 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
That example page shown in Ebay is identical to my photo of the relevant page in AIR10/4038, except mine is a photograph and not straight, and poorish contrast, etc etc.

It's part of this series

Knowing how much effort I went to to to photograph the document (1,000 pics), and then edit them, then the price isn't too bad.

I don't know who is actually producing them.

Bear in mind that 4038 is the 1942 airfield 'census'. AIR10/4039 is the 1944 version and will contain many more airfields - the first extras being Andrewsfield, Anthorn and Appledram. Does this volume contain the extras?

Well worth investigating.

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2010 15:59 #5 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
This is the same set I saw at TNA last year. Because the two volumes were not together I thought they were £110 each!. I agree with Carnaby, having started on the larger AIR 10/4039, £110 is not that bad.
I spied "Maintenance" in there as well - is that worth getting? The description doesn't really give yopu a clue as to the contents. I might ask Mrs PNK to get me it for Xmas. I think it was mentioned in another thread as well.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Jul 2010 11:01 #6 by REF
Replied by REF on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
Thanks for the comments chaps, sounds like it is worth getting but I can't afford that much at the moment!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Aug 2010 17:53 #7 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)

Bear in mind that 4038 is the 1942 airfield 'census'. AIR10/4039 is the 1944 version and will contain many more airfields - the first extras being Andrewsfield, Anthorn and Appledram. Does this volume contain the extras?

Viewed this volume in the TNA on Saturday; it's a reprint of AIR10/4038. It is therefore of interest to many people, but nowhere near as useful as a document based on AIR10/4039 - many more airfields, more information and higher quality photos. Wonder why 'they' chose to miss a great opportunity.

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Aug 2010 19:35 #8 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
Don't buy it, I too had a look at this at TNA, its published by the RAF Museum,. Its not worth it, some of the repro is poor and its based on a series of photocopies.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Aug 2010 19:56 #9 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
That is a shame as the original is difficult to photo cleanly due to the special protective covering on every page. I must admit I thought it was a bit poor for a professional job. At least it was flat though.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Aug 2010 06:58 #10 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic RAF Airfields in WWII (merged)
Carnaby did not have a problem.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.073 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information