Interesting the claim of the Consul being 'bullet & splinter proof'. According to my late father's RE recce pocket book, issued in 1944, the thickness of mild steel required for protection against ...'armour piercing 7.92mm ammunition or splinters from 100lb bombs bursting not less than 30 feet away'... was 1.75 inches, which would have made the Consul almost unmoveable.
So who do you trust when the action begins; the salesman or the RE - ?:shock:
Fair point there Simon, but if bombs were dropping on the factory then all is lost but if incendiaries are falling onto the factory then all is not lost and early warning of such devices is vital. That is all the consol shelter could do, protect the fire watcher. Its the same with 'protected' airfield buildings, the floors and roofs were nominally fire proof (Smith floors) for example in sergeants messes etc, the protection is always for fire never bombs. But yes always trust the RE, never the advertisment.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
And of course Paul, as the above information notice illustrates, one very common error that REALLY bugs me is when folk, especially those who should know better, refer to bomb & shell splinters as SHRAPNEL - !:-x
In the 'Then and Now' blitz volumes there is mention of one of these and pics. A few years ago ( prob 80s) one was removed from a garden in Walthamstow...how cool to have had one of them in your garden!! :0)
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.