RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011

09 Mar 2011 07:16 #11 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011
Boulmer (or should I say the modern day Boulmer) doesnt have a runway, but you can see the wartime runway from the top of the SAR flight building. And it does have fire cover, or it did when I visited it. Dont forget its got an underground bunker, remember Neatishead????

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Mar 2011 08:08 #12 by juddy
Replied by juddy on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011
Is the Bunker, part of current operations.

what type of fire cover is bulmer??

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Mar 2011 13:24 #13 by Yorkie370
Replied by Yorkie370 on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011
The main runway at Portreath is in good order, and ISTR it being used both by Culdrose Sea Kings and those of SARTU when it was at St Mawgan. Fire cover was provided by Culdrose - at least it was their vehicles that were encountered on the Redruth - Helston road.

These days the runway is more often used as a drag-strip.

As for Leconfield; you'd get some confused pilots, as the runways are laid-out with road markings, traffic-lights and roundabouts.

Dishforth was visited by C-130 in 94, to fly some Lynx out to the Balkans. While taxi-ing one of the Hercs' crewmen got injured. Seemingly he popped-out onto a wingtip to check the clearance from an adjacent tree and fell off.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Mar 2011 18:47 #14 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011
Boulmer IIRC had a TACR.

But why the interest in the fire cover everywhere? Not planning a bit of arson are we????

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Mar 2011 21:16 #15 by 92fis
Replied by 92fis on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011

Boulmer (or should I say the modern day Boulmer) doesnt have a runway, but you can see the wartime runway from the top of the SAR flight building. And it does have fire cover, or it did when I visited it. Dont forget its got an underground bunker, remember Neatishead????


As it doesn't have a runway it isn't a relief landing ground. Most if not all stations (flying or not) have some form of fire cover, as there is SAR flight based there they will certainly have fire cover.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Mar 2011 00:32 #16 by juddy
Replied by juddy on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011

Boulmer IIRC had a TACR.

But why the interest in the fire cover everywhere? Not planning a bit of arson are we????


Yes iam a mad man with a tanker full of kerosene.... I was just looking at current RAF airfields both active and reserve/relief, and thus wondered what if any fire cover was provided thats all, also i would be interested to know if fire cover was provided at other non flying installations, be these UK.US, suppose as my own Fire truck came from a ROF i have a interest in these things.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Mar 2011 07:21 #17 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011
92fis, in answer to your question about Boulmer, if you read an earlier post Juddy did ask about Boulmer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Mar 2011 19:17 #18 by 92fis
Replied by 92fis on topic RAF reserve landing airfields status 2011

92fis, in answer to your question about Boulmer, if you read an earlier post Juddy did ask about Boulmer.

Yes I saw that, but i was just trying to point out that Boulmer isn't a RLG which is what the original question was about. As i said before most if not all stations have some form of fire cover even if they are non flying stations.
Everytime when the Herc's from Mildenhall use Sculthorpe they send a fire engine from Lakenheath or Mildenhall to provide fire cover while they are using the airfield.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.052 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information