Building type ID needed

13 Mar 2009 19:30 #11 by REF
Replied by REF on topic Building type ID needed
Is building 71 the Boulton & Paul Hangar?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Mar 2009 19:33 #12 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Building type ID needed

Is building 71 the Boulton & Paul Hangar?

I believe it is.

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Mar 2009 21:17 #13 by mawganmad
Replied by mawganmad on topic Building type ID needed
Yes it is, Carnabus my lovely where on earth did you get those plans?! I take it you don't have the key for the bdg numbers?
I was about to start a new thread asking if anyone possessed RNAS site plans!

I didn't realise that the accommodation huts were interesting in being linked in rows by corridors at one end, something that the plan also shows.
Bdg 60 is the medical section, that is anotated on my more basic station layout plan

James Thomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Mar 2009 21:34 #14 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Building type ID needed
Regarding RNAS plans, I assume you have tried the FAAM? They sent me some copies of Dounreay and Stretton (In parts of course). Now need to check if there is a key with them!

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 07:09 #15 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Building type ID needed
Thanks mawganmad. I am too busy doing other things to go off at a tangent but it is certainly of future interest. RD (of Antlantikwall fame)has St Merryn on his site with a number of images of buildings in the Bomb Store area. I can only guess the function but suspect that some are post WW2 construction.

Hi Peter,
Was on the phone to FAAM reserach library yesterday. According to the woman I spoke to they don't hold (or have heard of) site plans, or building plans and types.
I think the Admiralty just did things differently to the AM/RAF.
I do have a basic site plan of St Merryn, but it dosen't list most specific buildings and uses, but does with the important ones, and runway headings etc - just a general reference really. TNA/IWM might be better?

I have spent alot of time researching FAA aircraft in the FAAMRL and is well worth a visit.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 07:10 #16 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic Building type ID needed

Regarding RNAS plans, I assume you have tried the FAAM? They sent me some copies of Dounreay and Stretton (In parts of course). Now need to check if there is a key with them!


Curious PNK, that conflicts with what mawganmad was told (see his post above).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 08:39 #17 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Building type ID needed
Mawganmad, the corridors are still there - check you photos.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 09:41 #18 by mawganmad
Replied by mawganmad on topic Building type ID needed

Regarding RNAS plans, I assume you have tried the FAAM? They sent me some copies of Dounreay and Stretton (In parts of course). Now need to check if there is a key with them!


Peter, check out my post#3. When I phoned they had no knowledge of site plans, cataloging problems I wonder?!

NP, you just wrote what I said in previous post, it was only when I looked at my pictures that I noticed the corridors!

James Thomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 13:03 #19 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Building type ID needed

Peter, check out my post#3. When I phoned they had no knowledge of site plans, cataloging problems I wonder?!


Hmm. I think I contacted them by email some years ago, I tend to waffle on the phone. They replied and send me some A3 copies which I had to stitch together on my PC. They didn't charge as my list was large and they didn't have them all.
Could be a cataloging problem or change of management/structure? Either way not helpful.

The source of basic layouts of RNAS stations seems to be some sort of navigational publication similar to AIR 10/4038/9. I haven't seen it in full but the plans are widely published. I think they came with both vertical and oblique aerial photos. Can anyone confirm?

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2009 16:44 #20 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic Building type ID needed
TNA has some RNAS plans in a folder under MFQ 1/61 (formally ADM 1/16427), e.g.
MFQ 1/61/11 Cornwall. Plan of camp and runways at St Merryn RN Air Station. Reference note to buildings and roads. Compass indicator. Amended to April and August 1944.

It's a 'huge' folder approx 1.5m x 1m (but not very thick) and has plans of around a dozen stations, but only building keys for Twatt and Yeovilton. The latter is an enormous plan which is impossible to copy; the other plans are just very difficult. You would have to stand on the table which I don't think TNA would be too happy about.

The Navy did some awkward things in its time :roll:

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.053 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information