Agreed. The Tail Unit is not a Number 78 (TB) or 82 (GS) the fin profile is different and they are not offset for spin.
That bomb has a suspension lug which TB and GS did not they were chain suspended.
The first and fifth bombs are US (NATO) Mk 82 GP Bombs with a Snake Eye T.U. which are 2.2 metres LOA making the centre bomb around 5.5 meters LOA. There appears to be no provision for a fairing band between the bomb body and TU.
I cannot identify it. Perhaps it is an odd WW2 prototype
As part of the development of Tallboy and Grand Slam there was a 4000 pound development model produced for trial drops and designated Tallboy (S) - Small - Never intended to be operational. Around 12 were produced. I assume that the 4000 pound nomenclature referred to the empty case. Just a thought.
As part of the development of Tallboy and Grand Slam there was a 4000 pound development model produced for trial drops and designated Tallboy (S) - Small - Never intended to be operational. Around 12 were produced. I assume that the 4000 pound nomenclature referred to the empty case. Just a thought.
Agree the tail unit of the Debden example does not look right for a Tallboy Small. Too short/out of proportion to be a Tallboy Small as per the one at Brooklands? A "marriage" of two bombs?
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.