1940 airfields

12 Jan 2009 22:11 #11 by REF
Replied by REF on topic 1940 airfields
They are not Nissen Huts, I think they are curved Turners Asbestos Huts. The corrugations don't look right to be nissens, they are too small and not big enough if that makes sense.

Hope this clears things up!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Jan 2009 22:12 - 18 Mar 2018 17:25 #12 by Pat_Pattle
Replied by Pat_Pattle on topic 1940 airfields

I remember these photos. It always struck me as very "farmy". Next to the "nissens" is an open barn with tents inside so it seems to support the farm building theory. If there are plans from this period then I assume they would be marked as something other than Nissen?


The only plan I have is dated 1944 and shows peritracks & blisters etc. If they're ministry buildings then I guess there must be a plan, if they're farm buildings probably not.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Jan 2009 22:14 #13 by Pat_Pattle
Replied by Pat_Pattle on topic 1940 airfields

They are not Nissen Huts, they are actually curved Turners Asbestos Huts.


well that's good news then, and I've learned something today :D does anyone have any info on these buildings? are they 'official' ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Jan 2009 22:19 #14 by REF
Replied by REF on topic 1940 airfields
I'll check my plans when I get home at the weekend - if you can wait that long!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jan 2009 09:18 #15 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic 1940 airfields
I would like to review what I have said previously, having carried out more research on Nissen huts. Nissen huts were available to the AM in 1940, though not in great numbers as most went to the army. At Fowlmere, there were Nissens in 1940, only a handful (these are shown on the site plan without drawing numbers), while the later Nissens are shown on the plan with drawing numbers and these are part of the massive drive by the Air Ministry to adopt the Nissen as the standard prefab hut and as the main replacement for the temporary brick hut.

To re-cap, pre-1941 Nissen huts do not have drawing numbers, they are rare but they did exist.

Whilst underground Nissen air-raid shelters were promoted by the company, in the months leading up to WW2, its quite likely that the underground 'nissen's as built at Kenley, Northolt, Duxford and West Raynham etc are all in fact 'Summers' shelters and not Nissens, though they do look similar (but in reverse as the vertical corrugations are inside not just outside as on the true Nissen).

Hope this helps and sorry about the confusion.

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jan 2009 19:25 #16 by Pat_Pattle
Replied by Pat_Pattle on topic 1940 airfields
"Hope this helps and sorry about the confusion."

No confusion and certainly no apologies needed! :) I find this all very helpful and interesting and take my hat off to you guys who research it all and take the time to post, I hope I can offer some info back sometime.

I'll leave the huts in the Fowlmere model then but have removed them (and the blast shelters) from the other airfields.

Thanks again,

Clive

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jan 2009 17:49 #17 by mawganmad
Replied by mawganmad on topic 1940 airfields
Excellent work, and great idea crafting the airfields at a particular point in time.
If you're ever interested in doing wartime St Athan, Llandow or St Mawgan give me a PM.

James Thomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jan 2010 19:14 #18 by Able Mabel
Replied by Able Mabel on topic 1940 airfields
Just working my way through a whole host of subjects cos i've just joined but would like to add that YES they are Nissen huts; you can tell by the corrugated IRON, not asbestos covering. Plus the door and two window arrangement in typically Nissen. FWIW

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Jan 2010 04:28 #19 by PETERTHEEATER
Replied by PETERTHEEATER on topic 1940 airfields
It is usual to refer to Nissen covering as 'corrugated iron' when it fact it was corrugated steel. I don't know how this misnomer came about but it is was probably coined very soon after the material became available.

OK. Just found that the material was invented (in Britain) in early 1800's and was - originally - made from wrought iron.

But then, at one time, all vacuum cleaners were referred to as 'Hoovers' and all ball pens as 'Biros'!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Jan 2010 19:01 #20 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic 1940 airfields

It is usual to refer to Nissen covering as 'corrugated iron' when it fact it was corrugated steel.

There's aome people on here as nutty as some of us :grin:.

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.059 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information