Modeling Airfield Camouflage

10 Aug 2011 17:41 #41 by Able Mabel
Replied by Able Mabel on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
Thanks for the photo's in Post #40 PB
Thats the kinda photo that convinces me that buildings were almost randomly painted and not as the previous scheme of representing other buildings, cow sheds and cottages etc.
I know there may well have been exceptions to the rule but i have seen similar photo to those posted and i have so painted my models in the 'disruptive pattern' as so beautifully illustrated in the photos. You hardly notice the smaller Nissen in the background and even the road in the foreground may well have been painted ???

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Aug 2011 17:52 #42 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
No Abel it simply means that a change in policy occured. We know that such an earlier scheme existed of representing other buildings as one or two pictures have been posted on here (though I cannot remember where).

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 08:58 #43 by Able Mabel
Replied by Able Mabel on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
NP
I have no doubts that the early scheme existed, would like to see the photos you mentioned !
I am merely trying to state that the 'wrap-over' disruptive pattern is seemingly more evident from photos that i have and of those i have seen. To that end i am trying to encourage others to model, either on computer or physical models, such a sheme as appropriate.
I also believe that probably as late as, late 1943 and 1944, that camouflage was probably less an issue and building constructed at later dates were either plain cement render or one basic colour. Ian

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 09:45 #44 by ted angus
Replied by ted angus on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
Ian I was lucky enough to win a copy of AP 3236 the AHB 1956 publication WORKS 39-45. A big chapter on this subject and I am trying to get my old brain around it. One thing is clear: the paints used were totally unsuitable for vehicles so I am rapidly drawing the conclusion that the assumption in various publications that building camo paint was used on MT is far from correct. The standard camo colours that became BS 987C eg SCC 1a 2 14 etc we have now become familiar with, were originally published as Civil Defence Camo Establishment CDSE /987c. it dates back to at least dec 39 and originally contained 16 colours I wonder what they are ?? --Paul ??
It is possible Station Commanders purchased paint for MT etc that was to the shades in the 987C but of the correct type for vehicles. There is a note in a file at Kew that acknowledges that Units have been purchasing Camo paint for MT etc. prior to it being included in the contract spec .
Buildings camo is very interesting , one day once I catch up with my vehicle models I will have to have a good look at your Grimsby dio and get some buildings constructed.

TED

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 11:30 #45 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
Would some of the extant CTs have layers of old paint that could be recovered for colour matching? The secondhand bricks in our 1930s semi shewed plenty of old paint and plaster. Just an idea.

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 11:37 #46 by P Bellamy
Replied by P Bellamy on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage

The standard camo colours that became BS 987C eg SCC 1a 2 14 etc we have now become familiar with, were originally published as Civil Defence Camo Establishment CDSE /987c. it dates back to at least dec 39 and originally contained 16 colours I wonder what they are ??


I have a Civil Defence camouflage paint swatch card from 1939 tucked away in a box, will have a rummage and see if I can find it.

PB

Paul Bellamy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 11:44 #47 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
How does one photograph colours accurately? I have seen people photograph with a scale and colour strip at TNA would this be to change the output colours on screen or printer?

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 15:14 #48 by ted angus
Replied by ted angus on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
PB -- a copy of the card would be great !!

PNK -- a lot of info on other forums is written about camo colours. I feel much of it is assumption. people have found old items and and colour charts and drawn conclusions by matching to it. Personally I think its very flawed. An example is the assumption that all colour fades with age- so to reproduce it we will deepen the tone. For a long time I have been trying to convince people that the bronze green colours used prior to WW2 by the Military for vehicles does not fade- in fact darkens. This was a bugbare of Marchington depot with the Green Goddesses as some turned into patchwork quilts as it became impossible to do an asthetically acceptable patch repaint. I own a ex AFS austin Gipsy which I repainted in 2005 - if you lift the bonnet its amazing just how much the paintwork has darkened outside the engine bay, and this is with a tarp on it. My wife and I have identical PCs with identical software - no matter what we do to the monitor settings, identical colour charts downloaded from the same source have marked differences. . My other experience with greens is for several years we provided support to a couple of army units and did an annual repaint of their field guns and towing vehicles painted in both gloss and semi gloss finish for prestige events- again the paint always darkened.
So I would suggest at Kew take a several pics using different light settings. then save the 2 that looks the most like what your brain remembers . I have a colour chart for colours recommended for Palastine 1936, 2 researchers supplied me with copies that have marked differences.

Ian-- I have had a good read of AP 3236 ; the conclusion I draw is building camo painting became less regimented in early 1942 , and was downgraded several times until discontinued. I noted previously that aerial photos of Leucxhars show a gradual relaxation of the complexity of building camo painting as the war progressed.

TED

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 17:46 #49 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
Robins hangar at hatfield or is it a barn as I can see some cows?

Attached files [IMG]/community/81190=5479-hatfield 1.jpg[/img]

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Aug 2011 19:28 #50 by Peter Kirk
Replied by Peter Kirk on topic Modeling Airfield Camouflage
I must admit I used to use colours that "felt" right and I was happy with. I haven't come across the fading to a darker colour but the I don't get out much :)

No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.038 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information