PDM as applied to mines stands for Period Delay Mechanism. This mechanism was in the circuit to the Firing Unit and 'counted' the number of times that the FU electrical relay operated before actually passing the firing current. This was to permit the sea area covered by that mine to be crossed by vessels a number of times implying that it was safe before firing the mine.
So the '50% PDM meant that half of the mines were 'long delay' armed and the other half 'instant'. The PDM could not operate with some types of fuzing settings so I should be able to determine the mine types.
Excellent Peter, thanks very much.
Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite
Just dwelling over the '8.L.A'. sights. It was usual with fixed defence positions to have a capabilty to 'fire on fixed lines'. This was convenient at night when an enemy might be approaching unseen. The MG could be aligned onto a predetermined bearing (degrees) and fixed so that when fired it would cover only the specific line such as along a hedgerow. Perhaps the 8.L.A. is related to this.
A light case bomb shaped container with a tail unit which could be loaded with flares, incendiaries or frag bombs and provided a single convenient unit load. CPs were superceded by the Small Bomb Container (SBC!)especially for the carriage of 4 pound IBs.
Thanks Peter. This entry in particular says a lot about ORB entries. Was this the only month that 7 Sqn used CPs? I think not. Seems 'they' wrote just what they felt like at the time. Factual - yes. Contains all you need to know, definitely not.
Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite
Thanks Peter. This entry in particular says a lot about ORB entries. Was this the only month that 7 Sqn used CPs? I think not. Seems 'they' wrote just what they felt like at the time. Factual - yes. Contains all you need to know, definitely not.
First, due to senility (?) I typed an erroneous statement in Line 2 of my Post # 14. It should say CPs superceded the Small Bomb Container (SBC!)
Just looked at the date of the ORB entry. I should think that late in the war the CPs used were Photoflash or Skymarker loaded; but, there were many versions.
And what would help is if whoever compiled the Operations Record Book(ORB), compiled it correctly. In service writing you are supposed to spell out something such as say Search and Rescue and then put the abbreviation in brackets after it when you first use the term. After doing that then you use the abbreviations. So in the ORB it would be Search and Rescue(SAR). Im guessing that whoever compiled the ORB got entries from various sections and just entered them as they recieved them.And it makes it very confusing for researchers!
Absolutely right Canberra and it also begs the question, when were the entries written, a typical daily entry, not compiled on the stated day I suspect. What annoys me is that very often there is not even a date, and the entries are inconsistent. Vertically all the bomber command ORBs I have read start off very poorly for the years 1939 to 1941, then more info is given in 1942, even more in 1943 and by the time you get to 1944, each day is vertically a book in its own right! The day described in the most minute detail. As far as fighter command go, the very time you would expect masses written, is during the B of B but the Duxford ORB is appalling. In contrast, the Polish squadron (303 etc) entries for those units stationed at Northolt are very graphic and possibly with some considerable exaggeration.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.