Where is this thread going??? It's bad enough that I'm classed as an anorak plane spotter, but if I admit I hang around with people who collect models of control towers and train sets I'll have to make a noose and end it all!!
Dave, they are not train sets, they are model railways. It is not just a case of putting together a length of Hornby track and running a hogwarts express around it, some of us take pride in scratch-building military or civil scenes. I like modelling military dioramas for example LAA sites, pillboxes, hardened signal boxes and airfield buildings. Now that Hornby has released a 20-ton tank wagon in WD livery I might just include part of a fuel depot as well!
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
OK, I've briefly emerged from my potting shed to deliver this learned report to the AiX.....
Thanks to Paul Francis' superb book 'Control Towers' ( Airfield Research 1993 ) I can identify the Hornby tower as being a vague effort at portraying a 'civilianised' Watch Office for Bomber Satellite Stations 13726/41 - of which a prime example is cited as that of one of my favourite airfields, Little Staughton.
Here's a genuine, anorak-style comparison...
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
This image is hidden for guests. Please log in or register to see it.
As can easily be seen, Hornby haven't got it right. Apart for the obvious lack of a side window, the building simply isn't deep enough front-to-rear ; a complete set of rooms has been left out.
It's not totally beyond redemption - it bears a passing resemblance - but what with this and the Airfix effort, I wish someone from 'Cornby' would just get up to East Kirkby, take a few photos and drawings, and give us a proper WWII Watch Office for All Commands....
Excellent comparison shots Martin. I totally agree that there should be an affordable accurate model on the market. Flightline do one which is brass-etched (12779/41) but as with all models made from this medium, it is very expensive.
I wonder how Hornby could get it so wrong, I can understand why Airfix got it wrong as the model has been around since the 1960s but Hornby started with a clean sheet as it were.
You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.