Seeing those images of the reds in formation reminded me that I saw a scheme somewhere that Avro had briefly proposed to mount four Gnats under the wings of the Vulcan to take along and be released to provide fighter support. Clearly a suicide mission for the Gnat pilots, not surprisingly the proposal never went further than initial sketches.
iirc it was in a book i read years ago,along with a system of sideways ejecting ejecter seats for the crew downstairs.
Yes, aided by some counselling sessions I think !!
I can remember the 1993 airshow season feeling like it had a big hole in it after her original retirement & I think the 2016 season it will be felt a lot more as she has become so much more popular during the last few years. There's nothing really that can replace the Vulcan. We don't actually have any big four jet aircraft that appear regularly at airshows these days. If only the Nimrod was still flying!!
I suppose I will probably visit her at Doncaster for when they perform the fast runs down the runway just like I did at Brunty in the 90's. If only just to hear that howl.
The grounding of the Vulcan was being discussed by MP's this week and they stated that the reason for it being grounded was that neither BAE or RR had the knowledge or skilled personal available to inspect it ?
Assume that this is related to issuing an air worthy certificate which was also related to the grounding of Concorde ?
I noticed that they all enjoyed repeating the words " Xray- Hotel - Five - Five - Eight "
Surely the same must apply to other old and rare aircraft and engines? Who can inspect a Centaurus engine, for example, these days? Is it more to do with the complexity of the aircraft overall?
No Amount Of Evidence Will Ever Persuade An Idiot (probably not Mark Twain)
It's a fair statement. The engines are what has 'lifed' her I believe. The engines will require a major strip down, inspection and service to extend their life. I'm guessing that would mean having to take a team of people out of the workforce to first of learn how to do it from the old books and drawings, try it on an engine and then train others to do it. It would be almost like starting from scratch with a new engine. Oh! And then of course there's the issue of spares!
It would cost millions. It hurts to say this, but I'm not surprised they decided not to do it. Painful, but sound business sense.
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.