Gate Guards

18 Jan 2012 17:52 #131 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic Gate Guards
And quite rightly too. IIRC its RAF policy that you have a gate guard of a type that has served at the station, what relevance is a Phantom to Brampton???

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jan 2012 18:04 #132 by Brothmark
Replied by Brothmark on topic Gate Guards

And quite rightly too. IIRC its RAF policy that you have a gate guard of a type that has served at the station, what relevance is a Phantom to Brampton???


My question as well. Those in the interview were more into their personal experiences than the historical significance of the aircraft at present location.

8th Air Force Home Page mighty8thaf.preller.us/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jan 2012 18:18 #133 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic Gate Guards
It wasnt only Brampton that had this problem. RAF Woodvale was a Meteor station in the fifties and had a Meteor on the gate. They got a new CO who was ex Phantom pilot so he replaced the Meteor with a Phantom, a lot of the locals were annoyed at losing the Meteor.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jan 2012 22:28 #134 by Linton Lad
Replied by Linton Lad on topic Gate Guards
that a bit like boulmer then as that has a phantom for there gate guard

cheers rich

Many thanks from linton lad

come join my facebook group/ raf linton on ouse spotters group

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jan 2012 23:28 #135 by WJT
Replied by WJT on topic Gate Guards
Come on chaps - its simples:

Brampton - Phantom used to have a recce role and JARIC is/was at Brampton - simples.

Boulmer - used to control Phantoms - even more simples.

Woodvale - not so simples.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jan 2012 23:29 #136 by REF
Replied by REF on topic Gate Guards
You forgot Neatishead and St Athan - the both had Phantoms!!!! Simples or not simples???

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jan 2012 06:31 #137 by Linton Lad
Replied by Linton Lad on topic Gate Guards
ok why does stafford have a harrier then if its a mu base

thanks rich

Many thanks from linton lad

come join my facebook group/ raf linton on ouse spotters group

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jan 2012 07:31 #138 by canberra
Replied by canberra on topic Gate Guards
The Phantom had a recce role for about 6 years!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jan 2012 10:06 #139 by mawganmad
Replied by mawganmad on topic Gate Guards

You forgot Neatishead and St Athan - the both had Phantoms!!!! Simples or not simples???


St Athan had a Phantom because that's where the major servicing of the type was carried out, also the then CO was an ex Phanton chap and that's why XV500 was re serialled as 'XV498'.
As the station didn't have based squadrons as such it fell to finding an aircraft with other links, I'm trying to track down a Harrier GR.3 at the moment, but see St Athan thread as to why that will probably come to nothing.
I have heard that Neatishead has a Phantom in respect to both the stations', and aircrafts', role in UK air defence.

Personally I think it's great that some bases have gate guards which are related to a particular unit and not just the station/airfield, sometimes it's nice to look beyond the obvious, and for some units to be able to have an aircraft gate guard when otherwise they wouldn't.

James Thomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jan 2012 10:26 #140 by juddy
Replied by juddy on topic Gate Guards

New on the gate at RAF Wittering, Harrier GR.9 (ZD469). It was put in place on 27 April replacing the Harrier GR.3 which is now being refurbished. Photo taken today, 2 May 2011.

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.


Must be one of only a few left in the uk, since the fleet was sold to the us. All the harriers went for the price of a c130

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.053 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information